$299.80

Latest weekly close · Market cap $36.5B

CLS's EV/EBITDA is 19.7x, compared with 37.7x at the middle of 22 peers.

Peer group: AI Infrastructure. Updated .

CLS and AI Infrastructure, ranked by EV/EBITDA
StockEV/EBITDAOwn 5-year percentile
CLSCelestica19.7×3
ARMArm Holdings219.5×54
NBISNebius Group202.1×n/m, not ranked
ALABAstera Labs186.5×25
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices99.3×91
LITELumentum85.0×61
MRVLMarvell Technology82.5×75
CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd60.8×10
CIENCiena60.4×81
MPWRMonolithic Power58.2×51
ANETArista Networks48.5×88
INTCIntel41.3×80
AMATApplied Materials34.1×89
AVGOBroadcom34.1×45
KLACKLA34.0×85
LRCXLam Research31.1×81
GLWCorning29.9×86
8035.TTokyo Electron28.1×n/m, not ranked
NVDANVIDIA25.9×1
FNFabrinet23.4×63
DELLDell Technologies19.9×92
CRWVCoreWeave7.9×7
SMCISuper Micro Computer7.8×5
APLDApplied Digitaln/mn/m, not ranked
ASMLASML (ADR)n/mn/m, not ranked
COHRCoherentn/mn/m, not ranked
CORZCore Scientificn/mn/m, not ranked
TSMTSMC (ADR)n/mn/m, not ranked
Peer median37.7×
How to read this comparison

Covered companies in this theme. Shared exposure does not imply the same business model.

EV/EBITDA divides enterprise value (market value plus debt, minus cash) by EBITDA over the last twelve months. The peer median leaves out CLS and stocks without a reading.

Each percentile compares a stock with its own weekly readings over the last five years, so 20 means its EV/EBITDA is above 20% of its own past readings. It needs at least 26 weeks of history. It is not a rank against the other stocks in this table.

Different growth rates, margins and financial risks can explain different multiples. Stocks without positive EBITDA have no reading.

CLS versus the peer median

-48%

CLS
19.7×
Peer median
37.7×
Own 5-year median
30.2×

Peer group

Source: SEC company filings and weekly market prices. Multiples use the last twelve months of financial results. Updated .

How the valuation data is built