Ambarella (AMBA) valuation
$66.27
Latest weekly close · Market cap $2.9B
Share AMBA P/S history
Below its usual range
Ambarella's P/S of 7.0x is lower than 87% of its weekly readings over the last five years (as of ).
- Forward P/E 62.8× (analyst estimates, not ranked).
- No P/E: earnings over the last twelve months are negative.
- No EV/EBITDA: recent financial data is missing.
Weekly P/S with its 5-year range
P/S each weekMiddle half of the last 5 years5-year median 8.8×
- 5-year median
- 8.8×
- 10-year median
- 8.0×
- 5-year low to high
- 5.4× to 26.7×
- Versus 5-year median
- -21%
P/S
13thpercentile
of its weekly readings over the last five years
Growth, last 12 months vs the year before
- Revenue
- +20%decelerating
- EPS
- n/m
Price vs revenue and EPS, indexed to 100
Each line starts at 100 at its first positive reading over the last five years. Revenue and EPS change at fiscal quarter ends. EPS was not positive in this window, so it is left out.
PriceRevenue, last 12 months100 = first reading
P/S at each year-end
The last weekly reading of each year, and its percentile against the five years before it.
| Year-end | P/S | 5-year percentile | P/E | EV/Sales | EV/EBITDA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6× | 31 | n/m | 7.8× | n/m | |
| 12.7× | 74 | n/m | 11.8× | n/m | |
| 9.5× | 61 | n/m | 8.7× | n/m | |
| 9.2× | 65 | n/m | 8.6× | n/m | |
| 26.1× | 98 | n/m | 24.6× | n/m | |
| 14.7× | 99 | n/m | 12.7× | n/m | |
| 9.4× | 86 | n/m | 7.6× | n/m | |
| 4.7× | 17 | n/m | 3.3× | n/m | |
| 6.5× | 54 | 56.5× | 5.4× | 37.9× | |
| 6.4× | 47 | 42.0× | 5.4× | 30.6× |
Loading peers and related research…
About this history
- What is AMBA's current P/S?
- Ambarella's P/S of 7.0x is lower than 87% of its weekly readings over the last five years (as of Oct 29, 2026).
- What is AMBA's five-year median P/S?
- 8.8x. Half of AMBA's weekly readings over the last five years were higher and half were lower. This page has 686 weekly readings, from Sep 9, 2013 to Oct 26, 2026.
- Does a low historical rank mean a stock is a buy?
- No. The rank compares AMBA only with its own past. Slower growth or more risk can justify a lower multiple than before. P/E uses earnings and P/S uses revenue from the last twelve months.