What is FER's five-year median EV/EBITDA?

There are not enough weekly readings yet for a five-year median EV/EBITDA.

Does a low historical rank mean a stock is a buy?

No. The rank compares FER only with its own past. Slower growth or more risk can justify a lower multiple than before. P/E uses earnings and P/S uses revenue from the last twelve months.

Ferrovial (FER) valuation history

Industrials

$56.92

Latest weekly close · Market cap $40.9B

Ferrovial's EV/EBITDA is unavailable because recent financial data is missing (as of Oct 30, 2026).

Forward P/E 42.2× (analyst estimates, not ranked).
No P/S: recent financial data is missing.
No EV/Sales: recent financial data is missing.

No EV/EBITDA chart for FER right now

FER has no weekly EV/EBITDA history to chart yet.

EV/EBITDA

n/mnot ranked

EV/EBITDA needs more weekly history to be ranked.

Growth, last 12 months vs the year before

Revenue: +5%
EPS: n/m

Industrials peers on EV/EBITDA

Each percentile compares a stock with its own last five years.

Compare FER with peers

Industrials peers of FER on EV/EBITDA
Stock	EV/EBITDA	Versus its own history	5-year percentile
AALAmerican Airlines Group Inc	9.1×	Above its usual range	72
AAONAAON Inc	21.1×	Historically low	4
ADPAutomatic Data Processing	17.1×	Below its usual range	25
ALLEAllegion	16.2×	Within its usual range	58
ALSNAllison Transmission Holdings Inc	11.8×	Above its usual range	89

Appears in

Sector: Industrials
Screens: Nuclear Stocks: Valuation Screen
Semiconductor Equipment Stocks: Valuation Screen

Screen Industrials stocks the same way

Research on FER

No articles about FER yet. How valuation percentiles work

Loading peers and related research…

About this history

What is FER's current EV/EBITDA?: Ferrovial's EV/EBITDA is unavailable because recent financial data is missing (as of Oct 30, 2026).
What is FER's five-year median EV/EBITDA?: There are not enough weekly readings yet for a five-year median EV/EBITDA.
Does a low historical rank mean a stock is a buy?: No. The rank compares FER only with its own past. Slower growth or more risk can justify a lower multiple than before. P/E uses earnings and P/S uses revenue from the last twelve months.