What is QS's five-year median EV/EBITDA?

There are not enough weekly readings yet for a five-year median EV/EBITDA.

Does a low historical rank mean a stock is a buy?

No. The rank compares QS only with its own past. Slower growth or more risk can justify a lower multiple than before. P/E uses earnings and P/S uses revenue from the last twelve months.

QuantumScape Corp (QS) valuation history

Consumer Discretionary

$4.20

Latest weekly close · Market cap $2.6B

QuantumScape's EV/EBITDA is unavailable because recent financial data is missing (as of Oct 30, 2026).

No P/E: recent financial data is missing.
No P/S: recent financial data is missing.
No EV/Sales: recent financial data is missing.

No EV/EBITDA chart for QS right now

QS has no weekly EV/EBITDA history to chart yet.

EV/EBITDA

n/mnot ranked

EV/EBITDA needs more weekly history to be ranked.

Growth, last 12 months vs the year before

Revenue: n/m
EPS: n/m

Consumer Discretionary peers on EV/EBITDA

Each percentile compares a stock with its own last five years.

Compare QS with peers

Consumer Discretionary peers of QS on EV/EBITDA
Stock	EV/EBITDA	Versus its own history	5-year percentile
APTVAptiv	7.2×	Historically low	4
BWABorgWarner Inc	8.9×	Above its usual range	88
GNTXGentex Corp	6.5×	Historically low	0
LEALear Corp	5.2×	Below its usual range	21
ABNBAirbnb	n/m	Not ranked	n/m, not ranked

Appears in

Sector: Consumer Discretionary
Screens: Nuclear Stocks: Valuation Screen
Semiconductor Equipment Stocks: Valuation Screen

Screen Consumer Discretionary stocks the same way

Research on QS

No articles about QS yet. How valuation percentiles work

Loading peers and related research…

About this history

What is QS's current EV/EBITDA?: QuantumScape's EV/EBITDA is unavailable because recent financial data is missing (as of Oct 30, 2026).
What is QS's five-year median EV/EBITDA?: There are not enough weekly readings yet for a five-year median EV/EBITDA.
Does a low historical rank mean a stock is a buy?: No. The rank compares QS only with its own past. Slower growth or more risk can justify a lower multiple than before. P/E uses earnings and P/S uses revenue from the last twelve months.