What is STZ's five-year median P/S?

There are not enough weekly readings yet for a five-year median P/S.

Does a low historical rank mean a stock is a buy?

No. The rank compares STZ only with its own past. Slower growth or more risk can justify a lower multiple than before. P/E uses earnings and P/S uses revenue from the last twelve months.

Constellation Brands (STZ) valuation history

Consumer Staples

$130.35

Latest weekly close · Market cap $22.1B

Constellation Brands' P/S is unavailable because recent financial data is missing (as of Oct 30, 2026).

Forward P/E 11.5× (analyst estimates, not ranked).
No P/E: recent financial data is missing.
No EV/Sales: recent financial data is missing.
No EV/EBITDA: recent financial data is missing.

No P/S chart for STZ right now

STZ has no weekly P/S history to chart yet.

P/S

n/mnot ranked

No P/S rank: recent financial data is missing.

Growth, last 12 months vs the year before

Revenue: -4%accelerating
EPS: n/m

Consumer Staples peers on P/S

Each percentile compares a stock with its own last five years.

Compare STZ with peers

Consumer Staples peers of STZ on P/S
Stock	P/S	Versus its own history	5-year percentile
BF-BBrown–Forman	3.3×	Below its usual range	14
ACIAlbertsons Cos Inc	0.1×	Historically low	5
ADMArcher Daniels Midland	0.5×	Within its usual range	63
BGBunge Global	0.2×	Historically low	8
BJBJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc	0.6×	Above its usual range	75

Appears in

Sector: Consumer Staples
Screens: Nuclear Stocks: Valuation Screen
Semiconductor Equipment Stocks: Valuation Screen

Screen Consumer Staples stocks the same way

Research on STZ

No articles about STZ yet. How valuation percentiles work

Loading peers and related research…

About this history

What is STZ's current P/S?: Constellation Brands' P/S is unavailable because recent financial data is missing (as of Oct 30, 2026).
What is STZ's five-year median P/S?: There are not enough weekly readings yet for a five-year median P/S.
Does a low historical rank mean a stock is a buy?: No. The rank compares STZ only with its own past. Slower growth or more risk can justify a lower multiple than before. P/E uses earnings and P/S uses revenue from the last twelve months.